Advanced Securities Consulting

Blog Category:

Formal Regulatory Remedies

Fed Official Outlines Potential Changes to Basel III Endgame Proposal

by | Sep 13, 2024

On September 10, 2024, Michael S. Barr, the Federal Reserve Board Vice Chair for Supervision, delivered a speech at the Brookings Institution outlining potential changes to the Basel III Endgame and G-SIB Surcharge proposals, originally released in July 2023. Barr characterized these changes, developed collaboratively by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), as both “broad and material”.

While Barr did not specify an exact release date for the reproposal, he indicated that it would be reviewed in an open board meeting, followed by a 60-day comment period. Implementation is anticipated one year after the final rule’s release.

read more

SEC Adopts Long Awaited Securities Lending Disclosure Rule

by | Oct 12, 2023

Persuasive Public Comment Helps Mold the Final Rule The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has adopted a new rule, rule 10c-1, to increase transparency in the securities lending market. The rule requires certain persons to report information about securities loans to a registered national securities association (RNSA). The RNSA will then make certain information publicly […]

read more

The SEC Unveils its Agenda for 2023

by | Jan 11, 2023

In its recently updated regulatory flexibility agenda, the Securities and Exchange Commission has announced its regulatory priorities for 2023. A mix of old and new business, the Commission’s 2023 plans include finalizing 29 existing proposals and placing 23 new proposals up for consideration. In a January 4, 2023 press release announcing the updated agenda, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler stated that the agency’s agenda “reflects the need to modernize our ruleset, moving deliberately to update our rules in light of ever-changing technologies and business models in the securities markets.” Regulatory flexibility agendas are aspirational, and the SEC’s rulemaking agenda could change throughout the year.

read more

SEC Beefs Up Proxy Voting Disclosure

by | Nov 27, 2022

On November 2, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finalized the first of its market data rule proposals. The amendments to form N-PX bring greater detail, consistency, and usability to the proxy voting information reported by mutual funds. These changes came in response to investors, who have said for nearly twenty years that they would benefit from more readily usable information and greater details.

read more

Serious Doubts About the SEC’s Short Sale Proposals

by | Sep 29, 2022

In February of 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed new disclosures to provide more transparency into institutional investors’ short-selling activity. According to Chairman Gensler, collecting more granular data from large short sellers “would help us to better oversee the markets and understand the role short selling may play in market events.” Despite these lofty goals, industry commenters are raising serious questions about whether some elements of the proposed new disclosure regime are structurally and technologically feasible.

read more

Bringing Crypto Asset Activities Into the Regulatory Perimeter

by | Aug 19, 2022

A collection of the globe’s most significant securities trade associations joined forces to file a comprehensive response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (BCBS) second public consultation on the prudential treatment of banks’ crypto-asset exposures. The September 30, 2022, letter voiced support for the design of the crypto-asset exposure framework proposed by BIS in its June 10, 2021, initial and follow-up June 30, 2022, consultations.

read more

Is T+1 Something We Can All Agree On?

by | Jun 19, 2022

In moving to shorten the U.S. securities settlement cycle by one day to T+1, the Securities and Exchange Commission appears to have hit on something upon which virtually everyone can agree. Judging by the comments to the SEC’s T+1 proposal, everyone from State Street to the Cornell Securities Law Clinic agrees that moving to T+1 is both desirable and beneficial to risk management in the long run. That said, despite this rare moment of accord between the regulator and the regulated, according to some commenters, some parts of the proposed implementation need attention, fine-tuning, or reconsideration.

read more

SEC Gets an “Earful” on Securities Lending and Short-selling Disclosure Proposals

by | Apr 17, 2022

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s controversial securities lending disclosure proposal (Proposal) sought public input on 97 questions and received a substantial body of feedback during the initial 30-day comment period. Drawing sharp rebukes, most responses from trade associations for lenders and borrowers focused on the ambiguous scope of rule 10c-1, the feasibility of the proposed 15-minute reporting regime, lopsided cost and technology burdens, and the risks of reverse engineering posed by the public disclosure provisions.

read more

Disclosure and Beyond: Restructuring the U.S. Equity Markets

by | Mar 19, 2022

On Friday, February 25, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed its latest round of GameStop rule proposals. In addition to enhanced public disclosures of short sales by institutional investors, the Commission announced a 30-day extension of the comment period on its sweeping securities lending disclosure proposal, Rule 10c-1, and technical amendments to the “consolidated audit tape” regulations.

read more

T+1: The Future is Now (or at least as early as 2024)

by | Feb 14, 2022

While real-time settlement is still something that may happen far in the future, perhaps on the Starship Enterprise, T+1 is now imminent. On February 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed to make T+1 a reality. The proposal aimed at reducing risks in clearance and settlement seeks comment on shortening the current T+2 standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions by one day to T+1.

read more

Selling Transparency: A Bean Counter’s Blog

by | Dec 6, 2021

A new disclosure data model has just been proposed by the SEC for U.S. securities lenders. Adoption of the model, called 10c-1 after the revised regulation, would be “one of the most drastic adjustments in the history of the securities lending industry,” writes Sidley Austin, a leading Wall Street law firm and advisor to broker-dealers. Previously, we have explained the proposal and intended benefits. Now we begin to analyze the proposed 10c-1 disclosure system’s value proposition. Will disclosure help more than it will cost to create and manage the network that supports the new disclosure system?

read more

Reddit Trading and Resilience in U.S. Equity Finance Part 4

by | Sep 24, 2021

Paris, September 24, 2021 – The next shoe has fallen in reaction to the January 2021 GameStop short squeeze, by which certain online brokers interpreted clearinghouse rules to necessitate the suspension of their retail customers’ ability to buy “meme stocks”. Today, the European Securities Markets Authority (ESMA), citing SEC and EU data for January 2021 on suspiciously high levels of failed meme stock settlements, asked for public comment on rule changes to avoid future short squeezes in the EU. This ESMA consultation on systemic risk management will surely propel industry leaders to advance their previously-announced plans for a block-chained securities market infrastructure to add even more robust operating and disclosure protocols.

read more

Get Your ESG House in Order

by | May 21, 2021

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has taken global financial markets by storm over the last few years. Post-pandemic, the demand for ESG investments has only intensified and has proven to be much more durable than a fad. However, lack of consistency and transparency threatens the trustworthiness of ESG as a category, and has led to accusations of ‘greenwashing.’

read more

Reddit Trading and Resilience in U.S. Equity Finance Part 2

by | Mar 17, 2021

On February 4th, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission called for a “robust public discussion” about whether online brokers’ late January suspensions of retail trading should lead to changes in the market infrastructure. In the view of attorneys for the aggrieved retail traders, there will be a lot for the SEC to consider. More than 50 lawsuits have been filed as of today, creating another form of discussion. Our blog series on the potential infrastructure changes continues with a few of the likely discussion topics.

A large class-action lawsuit has cited, as evidence of an anti-trust conspiracy, the alleged wave of selling by hedge funds and institutions in the overnight markets of January 27th, 2021. Plaintiffs allege that the hedge funds, their brokers and the institutional investors conspired to prevent further increases in the prices for the contested issues, which would have deepened their already-substantial losses.

read more

Reddit Trading and Resilience in U.S. Equity Finance Part 1

by | Mar 11, 2021

The trading suspensions set by online brokers in late January 2021 reminded many industry veterans of the systemic circuit breakers that were first deployed during the Black Monday crash of October 1987. In both instances, a loose band of derivatives traders was prevented by the capital rules of the equity clearing and settlement system from continuing to crush exposed short sellers and risk a systemwide collapse.

read more

Will Securities Lending Indemnification Be Regulated Into Oblivion?

by | Dec 20, 2014

Borrower default indemnification, sometimes referred to as a “securities replacement guarantee,” is fairly common in the securities lending industry. Under the typical arrangement, should a borrower of a security fail to return it at the end of the loan, the lending agent agrees to purchase a replacement security for the lender using the proceeds of the collateral posted by the borrower for the loan. The indemnity is applicable if the price of the replacement security exceeds the value of the collateral. In such a case, the lending agent agrees to make up the difference.

For many years, banks have provided borrower default indemnification as part of their securities lending services, which has given beneficial owners additional assurance as to the safety of their lending programs, and has allowed pension funds and others for whom such indemnity is legally required to participate in the securities lending market as well.

read more